Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Int J Pharm ; 640: 123035, 2023 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2313531

ABSTRACT

Cannabidiol (CBD) has a number of biological effects by acting on the cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2. CBD may be involved in anti-inflammatory processes via CB1 and CB2 receptors, resulting in a decrease of pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, CBD's poor aqueous solubility is a major issue in pharmaceutical applications. The aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate a CBD nasal spray solution. A water-soluble CBD was prepared by complexation with ß-cyclodextrin (ß-CD) at a stoichiometric ratio of 1:1 and forming polymeric micelles using poloxamer 407. The mixture was then lyophilized and characterized using FT-IR, DSC, and TGA. CBD-ß-CD complex-polymeric micelles were formulated for nasal spray drug delivery. The physicochemical properties of the CBD-ß-CD complex-polymeric micelle nasal spray solution (CBD-ß-CDPM-NS) were assessed. The results showed that the CBD content in the CBD-ß-CD complex polymeric micelle powder was 102.1 ± 0.5% labeled claim. The CBD-ß-CDPM-NS was a clear colorless isotonic solution. The particle size, zeta potential, pH value, and viscosity were 111.9 ± 0.7 nm, 0.8 ± 0.1 mV, 6.02 ± 0.02, and 12.04 ± 2.64 cP, respectively. This formulation was stable over six months at ambient temperature. The CBD from CBD-ß-CDPM-NS rapidly released to 100% within 1 min. Ex vivo permeation studies of CBD-ß-CDPM-NS through porcine nasal mucosa revealed a permeation rate of 4.8 µg/cm2/min, which indicated that CBD was effective in penetrating nasal epithelial cells. CBD-ß-CDPM-NS was tested for its efficacy and safety in terms of cytokine production from nasal immune cells and toxicity to nasal epithelial cells. The CBD-ß-CDPM-NS was not toxic to nasal epithelial at the concentration of CBD equivalent to 3.125-50 µg/mL. When the formulation was subjected to bioactivity testing against monocyte-like macrophage cells, it proved that the CBD-ß-CDPM-NS has the potential to inhibit inflammatory cytokines. CBD-ß-CDPM-NS demonstrated the formulation's ability to reduce the cytokine produced by S-RBD stimulation in ex vivo porcine nasal mucosa in both preventative and therapeutic modes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cannabidiol , beta-Cyclodextrins , Animals , Swine , Cannabidiol/chemistry , Micelles , Nasal Sprays , SARS-CoV-2 , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Cytokine Release Syndrome , beta-Cyclodextrins/chemistry
2.
J Drug Deliv Sci Technol ; 76: 103805, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2031441

ABSTRACT

Cannabidiol (CBD) was formulated as a metered dose inhaler (CBD-MDI) and evaluated in vitro for its efficacy as an inhaled dosage form against inflammation caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Escherichia coli, silica particles, nicotine, and coal tar. A CBD-MDI formulation was prepared with 50 mg of CBD in 10 mL for a CBD dose of 250 µg/puff. The formulation ingredients included CBD, absolute ethanol as a cosolvent, and HFA-134a as the propellant. High aerosol performance of CBD-MDI was obtained with mass median aerodynamic diameter of 1.25 ± 0.01 µm, geometric standard deviation of 1.75 ± 0.00, emitted dose of 244.7 ± 2.1 µg, and fine particle dose of 122.0 ± 1.6 µg. The cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory effectiveness of CBD-MDI were performed in alveolar macrophage (NR8383) and co-culture of alveolar macrophage (NR8383) and human lung adenocarcinoma (A549) cell line. CBD delivered from an MDI was safe on respiratory cells and did not trigger an immune response in alveolar macrophages. CBD-MDI effectively reduced the generation of cytokines in immune cells treated with viral antigen S-RBD, bacterial antigen LPS, silica particles, and coal tar. The efficacy of CBD-MDI was comparable to budesonide. Furthermore, the findings demonstrated that the use of CBD-MDI was more effective in treatment rather than prevention when inflammation was induced by either a viral or bacterial stimulant.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL